Bringing personal domains with provider approach, addressing portability
/2026-04/session/4-f/
Convener: Cagan Mert Islek (@cagan@cmislek.me)
Participants who chose to record their names here:
- Charles Iliya Krempeaux (@reiver@mastodon.social)
- Jayne Samuel-Walker (@tcmuffin@toot.wales)
- Aaron Klemm (@aklemm@mastodon.social)
- Anthony Bosio (@abosio@fosstodon.org)
- Manton Reece manton.org (@manton@manton.org)
- Luis Quintanilla (https://lqdev.me)
- Johannes Ernst (@j12t@j12t.social, @j12t.org)
- Matthias Pfefferle (@pfefferle@mastodon.social)
- Scott Jenson (@scottjenson@social.coop)
- Damon (@damonoutlaw.xyz)
- Diego (https://plaz.social)
- Ryan Barrett (https://snarfed.org)
Notes
-
Discussion about using your own Internet domain as your identity on the Fediverse.
-
CAGAN talking about it as a user-experience issue.
-
RYAN: there is a difference between your own domain being your identity versus logging in other places with your own domain. Rhese are different things.
-
JOHANNES: Idea: we should start with the user documentation. That doesn’t talk about protocols etc. But focuses on what the user sees so it makes sense to them with minimal amount of learning.
-
SCOTT & CHARLES: regular people don’t understand why they cannot use both Mastodon and Pixelfel and have the same Fediverse ID and have the posts go to the same place. Problem is Mastodon & Pixelfed are both front-ends and back-end, rather than front-ends that put data into the same back-end.
-
CAGAN: using your identity server as OTP servers, too
-
CHARLES: action plan?
-
RYAN: step #1: make it so Fedi software supports people using their own domain
-
Could we use Holos - https://holos.social
-
CAGAN: Holos is a great implementation but most users don’t want local experience and prefer convenience.
-
ActivityPub 2.0 working group is a good place to raise these questions.